Featured Healthcare

Pharmaceutical Pollution – A Low-Down

Drugs in water is an issue. And, statistics paint a bleak picture. For example, from United States and Canada, about 4.8 billion gallons of effluent flows into the Great Lakes every day. As per data from past 10 years, 42 compounds are compounding the situation of pharmaceutical compounds. And, these include antibiotics, anti-depressants, herbicides, and anti-inflammatory drugs. Besides, there is caffeine and a type of estrogen in the water.

About the Study:

Researchers from the University of Buffalo are onto a new process that removes these successfully to a large extent. And, their study on Eastern United States based water treatment plants reveals two treatments show potential. Mainly, these are ozonation and granular activated carbon.

One of the reasons the research is significant is that one of the biggest challenges is reducing antidepressant and antibiotics. And, this study addresses it. With the two techniques, about 95% reduction happens in terms of pharmaceutical concentrations.

Previously, the method was activated sludge. Mainly, it broke organic contaminants via action of certain microorganisms. Here, it is noteworthy that while it is critical, it is much less impactful than the two mentioned above. And, it is because the former’s action against persistent drugs is weak.

Significance of the Study Drugs in water is an issue. And, statistics paint a bleak picture. For example, from United States and Canada, about 4.8 billion gallons of effluent flows into the Great Lakes every day. As per data from past 10 years, 42 compounds are compounding the situation of pharmaceutical compounds. And, these include antibiotics, anti-depressants, herbicides, and anti-inflammatory drugs. Besides, there is caffeine and a type of estrogen in the water.

About the Study:

Researchers from the University of Buffalo are onto a new process that removes these successfully to a large extent. And, their study on Eastern United States based water treatment plants reveals two treatments show potential. Mainly, these are ozonation and granular activated carbon.

One of the reasons the research is significant is that one of the biggest challenges is reducing antidepressant and antibiotics. And, this study addresses it. With the two techniques, about 95% reduction happens in terms of pharmaceutical concentrations.

Previously, the method was activated sludge. Mainly, it broke organic contaminants via action of certain microorganisms. Here, it is noteworthy that while it is critical, it is much less impactful than the two mentioned above. And, it is because the former’s action against persistent drugs is weak.

Significance of the Study Outlined:

Diana Aga, Professor of Chemistry at University of Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences, explains impact succinctly. She states that the bottom-line of the study is that pharmaceutical pollutants are removable. Also, she claims that a number of cities are on it, already. And, she qualifies the statement with the fact that it is an expensive methodology

Furthermore, this leads us to the point where the promise of the report needs delineation. And it brings us here – these pollutants enter environment and cause major healthcare issues like antibiotic resistance.
Also, the paper includes contributions from Stony Brook University and Hazen and Sawyer. And, more details on the study are in the journal – Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology.

Outlined:

Diana Aga, Professor of Chemistry at University of Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences, explains impact succinctly. She states that the bottom-line of the study is that pharmaceutical pollutants are removable. Also, she claims that a number of cities are on it, already. And, she qualifies the statement with the fact that it is an expensive methodology.

Furthermore, this leads us to the point where the promise of the report needs delineation. And it brings us here – these pollutants enter environment and cause major healthcare issues like antibiotic resistance.
Also, the paper includes contributions from Stony Brook University and Hazen and Sawyer. And, more details on the study are in the journal – Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *